Tracking where policy ends and behavior breaks down
Organizations are building AI governance frameworks at record pace — but incidents keep rising. Our Behavioral Sufficiency research found that governance correlates with incident visibility, not prevention (r = 0.36). The problem isn't a lack of governance — it's that governance alone isn't sufficient to change how organizations actually behave.
This map measures the depth of behavioral insufficiency across 65 countries. Each record is scored on five dimensions — governance gaps, accountability absence, culture deficits, norm erosion, and reporting failures. Darker countries show deeper, multi-dimensional failure where governance isn't just inadequate in one way but is failing to constrain behavior across the board. Click any country to see which dimensions drive its score.
AI incidents, audit findings, policy reports, and use cases scored across five behavioral failure dimensions in 65 countries.
Governance frameworks exist in the vast majority of cases. The problem isn't a lack of rules.
Of cases with governance in place, behavior still wasn't aligned. Rules alone don't change what organizations do.
Nearly half of all failures involve two or more behavioral dimensions — not just one gap but systemic breakdown.